Seeking out an Assisted Living Facility
My wife, Clare, was admitted into the “Reflections” unit of
an assisted living facility in September, 2013.
“Reflections” is the name of a separate lockdown wing with 32 residents,
all with some form of dementia but most with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). I was Clare’s 24/7 caregiver while she
struggled with her cognitive decline starting in 2006, even though Clare was
not “officially” diagnosed with young onset AD until 2009, one month after
turning 63. When Clare’s decline had
progressed to the point where I could no longer provide her with the quality of
care she deserved, and when we began having daily arguments over routines such
as bathing, dressing, eating and taking medication, I knew that we were
approaching the time for an Assisted Living Residence (ALR) placement.
When we had retired in 2000, we had discussed our thoughts
about what we wanted should either of us ever need long term care. We were aware of friends and family who had
chosen different paths ... those who kept loved ones at home for as long as
possible with 24/7 live-in help, and those who had placed loved ones in ALRs
and nursing homes. Neither of us wanted
live-in help, so we took out long term health care insurance policies that
would provide maximum coverage if an ALR or nursing home placement were ever to
be needed. Despite these preferences
expressed more than a dozen years earlier, I again reviewed our options with
Clare during lucid moments in 2013 prior to her ALR placement, and Clare again
said she did not want to remain home with live-in assistance.
I made a thorough search of Long Island ALRs that had
separate units for those with dementia. I
wanted Clare placed in a facility that had certification to provide “continuity
of care,” certification not held by most assisted living facilities. In New York, some ALRs have EALR (Enhanced
Assisted Living Residence) and/or SNALR (Special Needs Assisted Living
Residence) certification. Residents can
usually remain in these ALRs until death, absent psychiatric disorders that can
make a resident dangerous to oneself or others, or the need for 24/7 skilled
nursing or medical care. This was very
important to both of us because we knew of caregivers whose loved ones with AD
had to be discharged from their ALRs when they became totally incontinent or
immobile. Facilities holding EALR or
SNALR certification also require aides to have ongoing specialized training to learn
how to deal more effectively with people with dementia, and that requirement
also made EALR and SNALR certified ALRs more attractive to us.
The good about Clare’s ALR
Placing Clare in her current ALR
turned out to be a complete “win-win” decision.
She receives high quality care in their 32 bed Reflections unit, with a
varied daily program of activities that keep her engaged and happy. On most days, Clare has organized exercise
periods twice a day ranging from Zumba, yoga, and balloon volleyball to
walking, stretching, and other fitness activities. On most days she has at least one art
activity and one music activity, and on many days she has two different musical
activities ranging from sing-alongs to listening to professional musicians who
come regularly to sing and entertain.
Clare also participates in a wide range of other daily activities ...
games, trivia contests, crafts, etc. ... and she watches matinee and evening
movies in a dedicated cinema room that has a very large movie screen, theatre
style seating, and even a popcorn machine!
There are many other indoor and
outdoor activities on site. There are
daily socials with different delicious snacks served each day, and daily meals
are of restaurant quality. Reflections
residents also have the opportunity to go on frequent outings each month via
mini-bus to see musicals in local theatres, to enjoy meals at various
neighborhood restaurants, and to visit local museums at nominal charges. There are also free outings for scenic drives
and visits to nearby beaches and towns. And,
when appropriate, Reflections residents are taken to join non-Reflections
residents to enjoy special entertainment activities provided by the ALR.
As her spouse caregiver, I wanted
Clare to be in a safe and secure environment, to receive high quality care, and
to engage in enjoyable activities and socialization experiences each day once
it was time for her to leave our home and live in an ALR. Mission accomplished! Clare and I are both happy that, given the
reality she could no longer remain with me in our house, she is in a positive
environment. That is why I refer to this
placement as a win-win.
The bad about Clare’s ALR
Clare’s ALR has a lot to offer its
dementia residents. This was and
continues to be the best ALR for Clare and we are both pleased with our
choice. Whereas I would now assign this
facility an overall grade of “A+,” some inconsistencies continue to disappoint
me. As a retired
public school principal, I know firsthand how even the best of bureaucratic
institutions is going to have “glitches” from time to time. I also know that, on some days, the proverbial
“Murphy’s Law” will frustrate the best administrators. However, I also know that to maximize chances
for mission success and minimize “glitches” and “Murphy’s Law” days from
happening frequently, administrators must insure that staff is properly trained,
informed of the high expectations and standards expected for daily performance,
and regularly observed and supervised. Few
administrative tasks are more important.
I regularly witness all
administrators committed to insuring the safety and well-being of Reflections
residents, and some administrators definitely hold staff to very high
performance expectations. But I do not
see all administrators providing the necessary supervision to ensure that all staff
members are doing their jobs properly. Since
bringing ongoing concerns to the attention of the executive director, there has
been tremendous improvement. However, I
should not have had to bring matters to the attention of the ALR executive
director ... they should have been handled properly by subordinate directors
with direct responsibility for the Reflections unit.
In addition, communication with some
administrators was very uneven until the executive director intervened. On some occasions I had waited as long as 12
days to receive responses to emails or voice mails. Such delayed response time is totally
unacceptable. There were also several occasions
when administrators were not on
the same page with each other, with one administrator asking me to do something
one way and another administrator asking me to do that same thing completely
differently. Therefore, it appears that
this ALR’s internal communication among administrators was at times as poor as
their external communication with caregivers.
Two Suggestions for Caregivers
I knew from Clare’s first day in her
ALR that even though I was no longer Clare’s 24/7 caregiver, I did not
relinquish my caregiving responsibilities completely after placement. I
would offer these suggestions for caregivers once they have placed their loved
ones in an ALR:
1. You will always remain a caregiver
for your loved one. Even though the
ALR is now ‘in charge’ of your loved one’s life for most of the day, you must
still make sure that your loved one is handling the activities of daily living
properly ... eating well, sleeping well, etc.
You also need to be sure that your loved one’s adjustment to the ALR is
as good as possible when first admitted, and that it continues to be a “good
marriage.” Over time you will discover
how to maximize your visits, the best times to visit, the best times for other
family and friends to visit, if occasionally taking your loved one out for
meals or short day trips would be a positive action, etc. You must also continue to ask questions to
learn about any changes in your loved one’s behavior and activity participation
because, sadly, you may not be able to count on ALR personnel to communicate
those changes to you in a timely fashion.
You must always remain vigilant.
If you are not pleased with your
loved one’s placement, and are unable to make that adjustment easier despite
all of your actions to help make that happen, meet with the highest level
administrator of that facility. You may
be lucky as I was to find an executive director who will listen to your
concerns and help to resolve them if at all possible. If all of your efforts to bring about change
are unsuccessful, however, in the
most extreme situation it may even be necessary to seek a placement in a
different facility.
2.
You must now also assume a new
role as an advocate. Once you have
relinquished primary responsibility for 24/7 caregiving to the ALR, you must monitor
how effectively that ALR is doing its job.
And you must be willing to tenaciously advocate for change when
necessary. Even in the best of ALRs,
there may be a lack of sufficient staffing and/or supervision at times, and you
must act as your loved one’s advocate if you observe unmet needs or actions
requiring more attention. Such is the
situation in which I now find myself. You
may need to meet again and again with the people in charge who are responsible
for making the changes you are seeking.
But you must not give up, regardless of obstacles that may be in your
path and regardless of your frustration at the slow pace of improvement. Remember, most ALRs, like most bureaucratic
institutions, are inherently status quo oriented and resistant to change. Too often the answer to a question about why
something is done in a particular way, or the response to a suggestion for
change, is a variation of, “Well, this the way we’ve always done it.” So be prepared to continue advocating long
and hard for the changes you want to see happen. Chances are, most changes will come about
slowly and incrementally.
Most importantly, caregivers must
always remember that even in the most caring of ALRs, nobody is going to care
about your loved one as much as you do.
Nobody. So as your major role as
your loved one’s caregiver decreases after an ALR placement, your new role as your
loved one’s major advocate is just beginning.
Four Suggestions for ALR
Executive Directors/Managers
I would also offer four suggestions
for ALR executives to deal with the issues that I have raised in this article. And remember ... these are suggestions for
improvement at what I consider an A+ rated facility, even with its glitches.
1.
Meet occasionally with caregivers
as a group. Despite caregivers
handing over almost all of the responsibilities for caring to the ALR,
caregivers still know their loved ones better than anyone else. Caregivers may be able to offer practical
suggestions for improving daily operations, or suggest new activity programming
opportunities, or make other helpful suggestions for improvement in routines or
daily practices. More importantly,
caregivers can give valuable feedback regarding how your ALR’s mission may be
compromised by staff. Much akin to
principals being available to meet with parents at monthly PTA meetings, ALR
directors and managers could learn a lot from occasionally meeting with
caregivers of their dementia residents. Face-to-face
meetings give the administrator the opportunity to clarify and explain policies,
correct and defuse misinformation, and hear comments that may be very helpful
to making their institution function more effectively and efficiently.
2.
Impress upon all staff the need for timely communication with caregivers. The last thing an ALR director or manager
needs to hear from a caregiver is how concerns about their loved ones go
unanswered or are ignored. This is a
sure way for bad PR to raise its ugly face in community discussions as well as possibly
lead to negative reviews of your facility on internet sites. This is especially harmful if such
perceptions are formed as a result of the actions ... or inactions ... of just
one or a few staff members who do not do their jobs properly, or who fail to respond
to emails or phone calls in a timely fashion.
The ALR chief executive needs to learn about such matters while issues
are easily resolvable. Even if only one
or two key staff members do not value timely communication with caregivers,
that is one or two staff members too many.
Just as with the proverbial weak link in a fence, all staff must be on
mission, not just most staff
3. Provide a handbook for caregivers of dementia residents - Anything in the dementia unit that is at variance
with overall ALR practices should be clearly stated. The handbook should also include a staff list
of names and titles of various administrators responsible for oversight of the dementia
unit, along with names of aides on various shifts who will work with residents
in the dementia unit. Phone numbers and
email addresses to facilitate contact should also be included.
4. Post in each room a list of care plan activities aides must carry out
each day – Each dementia resident will have a different daily care plan
requiring no, little, some or a lot of assistance with daily Activities of Daily
Living (ADLs). Whatever that level of
care is, there should be a checklist posted somewhere in each room so all aides
will know exactly what routines the dementia resident needs assistance in
doing, and just how much assistance is needed.
For example, does the resident shower by him/herself requiring only that
shampoo be provided, or must the aide actually apply the shampoo to the
resident’s hair?
The bottom line
Now closing in on a year after
admission into her ALR, Clare’s AD decline has continued and she is more
confused and more tired each day. But despite
this decline, Clare still looks younger and healthier than she has in
years. Perhaps this is because she is
now exercising and socializing with friends each day. Or, perhaps this is because she no longer has
to worry about anything ... although, I am told by aides, she still gets
anxious waiting for me to visit each day and misses me in the evenings. However, when I visit with Clare each day,
she is always smiling and telling me how happy she is and that she has had a
wonderful day ... despite being unable to tell me about even one activity she
participated in that day, or even one meal she has eaten, or able to recall
where she went on an outing. Can I
realistically ask for more than that?
Clare’s ALR also keeps caregivers’
needs in mind. When I come to see Clare
each day, we often head first to their bistro, a room available 24/7. There is a coffee machine where one can get
everything from cappuccino to latte, regular or decaf. There is also a juice machine, and snacks
ranging from fresh fruit to several varieties of cookies are always
available. We then often go to sit in
one of their many lounges. Some have
tables and chairs, some have sofas and easy chairs, and all have wide screen
television sets mounted on the walls. We
can also go to relax in their library or living room should we want to do
so. Should I want to eat alone with
Clare, or be joined by family and friends, I can reserve their private dining
room for lunch or supper where, for nominal cost, we can select appetizers,
entrees and desserts off the same menu given to the residents. (Menus change daily.) This room easily seats 10-12 people. I can also reserve their ‘country kitchen’ at
no cost and bring in my own food or have food delivered. This room has a refrigerator and microwave
oven, easily seating 20 around two large tables. Clare and I have already had several family parties
and holiday celebrations in this room with our children and grandchildren.
Our children and grandchildren also
appreciate the amenities of having quiet lounges to spend time with their
mother/grandmother during their afternoon or evening visits ... while also
availing themselves of juice and snacks from the bistro! In addition, there is also a game room,
computer room, billiard room, library, shuffleboard court, a golf putting
green, a walking path and garden, and even an outdoor swimming pool for use by
residents and guests. Can I ask for more
than that for when I visit with Clare each day, or for when our children and
grandchildren come to visit with Clare?
Are there still ongoing glitches and
communication difficulties? Yes, but now
that one particular administrator and the ALR executive director have welcomed
and been responsive to hearing my concerns, remaining issues are now resolved
quickly. Clare is now receiving
excellent care most of the time and enjoying her experience virtually all of
the time. That will always be my bottom line ... is Clare happy and is she
receiving high quality care. The answer
to both questions is an unqualified “yes,” despite the issues I have addressed
in this article.
Are my standards and expectations for
personnel and operations at Clare’s ALR too high? I don’t think so. I would hope that all staff at all ALRs would
aspire to achieve high quality care for its dementia residents, and be
responsive to caregiver concerns in a timely fashion, 100% of the time. Nothing less should be acceptable.
Published in Annals of Long Term Care (online only), June 20, 2014. Access at: www.annalsoflongtermcare.com/topic/alzheimers-disease.