Friday, January 17, 2020

Surviving a Partner's Alzheimer's Disease -- Losing Twice


I lost my wife, Clare, to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in the spring of 2016 and with 2020 now here I am still struggling to fully move on with the rest of my life. I did not expect to have such a long struggle because I had already felt widowed for several years before Clare died. She was confused all the time, she was increasingly unable to express herself in words, she no longer knew who I was, and we had been living apart. Her mental faculties were gone, and “Clare wasn’t Clare” anymore. I was grieving that loss every day.
But even after Clare’s mind was gone, I could still be with her. I held her hands, hugged her tightly, kissed her, and told her how much I loved her. Usually there was no response, sometimes I received a smile, and on those increasingly rare days when she would say a few words in response, her words were often, “Can you please find my husband?” Clare was “there” with me, yet really “not there” with me at all.
With no cure for AD, once your spouse or partner receives an AD diagnosis, it can become a death sentence. The unanswered question is how much quality time you may still have together. I started observing AD symptoms when Clare was 60 and her AD diagnosis was confirmed a few years later. After her diagnosis, we were only able to enjoy a few more good years together.
A fellow AD spouse, who was also still experiencing similar sadness and loss after the death of her husband, noted that losing someone you love to AD really means having to deal with death twice—first when you lose their mind, and then again when you lose their body.
That is a profound way to look at loss due to AD, especially for a surviving spouse who had been in a long and loving marriage. Once unable to have even the most basic conversations with an AD partner, the survivor begins grieving an almost unbearable loss. No longer being able to share the highs and lows of daily life, and no longer being able to share the joys of common memories is a difficult loss to face. In a very real way, once unable to communicate with your AD partner, the survivor may begin to mourn just as though their AD partner had already died.
However, surviving spouses and partners can still be with their loved one after their minds are gone. Even with no reactions or responses, survivors can continue to hold their hands, hug them, kiss them, and tell their AD partners they love them. Even when no longer able to talk with them, survivors can still talk to them.
Being able to hold a beloved AD partner in your arms while you talk to them, even when there is no verbal or physical reaction of any kind, can provide at least a small degree of emotional comfort for the survivor. Physical contact can, even if only for fleeting moments, help resurrect cherished memories that may counter some of those enormous feelings of daily sadness that never seem to leave.
A few months or years later, when a person loses their partner’s body, the survivor begins grieving painful loss a second time. Moving on after the loss of an AD partner’s physical presence, while still mourning the earlier loss of their mind, is a lot to move on from.
Social workers who facilitate support groups for those who have lost a partner to AD must understand that survivors may experience death differently than those in other support groups.
With Alzheimer’s, loved ones may experience a double loss.
— Allan S. Vann, EdD, a widowed spouse/caregiver, has written many articles to help AD caregivers, including several that have been published in Social Work Today. Caregivers can read copies of all of his published articles on Vann’s website at www.allansvann.blogspot.com.


Published in Social Work Today, online only .  Access at: https://www.socialworktoday.com/news/enews_0120_1.shtml

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Personal Blog #13 ... Dementia Patients in Hospital Emergency Departments


I have written several articles describing how poorly my late wife, a victim of early onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD), was treated whenever she was in a hospital Emergency Department (ED).  My ED experiences as her AD spouse caregiver were uniformly poor.  I always found nurses to be extremely competent and empathetic.  However, I almost always found doctors to be ignorant about how to communicate with her effectively, let alone how to diagnose and treat her effectively.  In addition, many times her doctors, and technicians, routinely refused my offers to provide information that would help them diagnose and treat her more effectively.  As a result, my wife suffered needlessly during each visit.

In my March/April 2018 article in Annals of Long-Term Care, I wrote a response to an article published in that journal’s previous issue about the American Geriatrics Society’s formation of the Geriatrics Emergency Department Collaborative (GEDC), a consortium of some of our country’s leading health systems and medical societies, “to help improve emergency care for our nation’s older adults.”  I expressed my appreciation for this initiative, but I also noted that there was no mention of the GEDC seeking input from the caregivers of dementia patients … the very people who could offer firsthand observations of patient care, and who could suggest possible recommendations for improved practice based upon their experiences.
The GEDC’s stated goal is to improve “healthcare outcomes” for older people in EDs. 

Their website (https://gedcollaborative.com/about/) states, “We are committed to making change through the education of individuals, and hospital-wide initiatives that create sustainable improvements in practice at all levels.”  The GEDC has now applied for a five year grant through the NIH (National Institutes of Health) and NIA (National Institute of Aging) “to support the development of a collaborative research and resource network to synergize the expertise, skills, and resources of investigators within the geriatric emergency medicine and Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease-related dementias (AD/ADRD) research communities, to identify and address research gaps towards optimizing recognition and emergency care of older adults with AD/ADRD.”

Last month I was honored to be asked to serve on the Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR 2.0) Task Force that will implement this grant if it is funded.  In my role as a former AD spouse caregiver, I will be able to provide a voice for dementia caregivers and their loved ones, and to describe what it’s like for dementia patients and their caregivers in an ED.  I will also serve as a dementia patient advocate to provide a voice for recommending improved medical training for ED personnel, and improved ED practices and procedures.

Should you have suggestions for improving patient care in hospital EDs, please email them to me at acvann@optonline.net and I will try to include them in my recommendations to the Task Force.  Meanwhile, I will provide periodic updates of the status of this grant proposal on this website.  It’s been almost four years since I was in an ED with my wife, and I would like to think that doctors have made some progress in learning how to communicate effectively with patients experiencing moderate or severe stages of AD or some other form of dementia.  I would also like to think that doctors have made some progress in learning how to effectively examine and diagnose dementia patients brought to their ED.  Sadly, dementia caregivers tell me this is still not happening. 

Please let me know if you have suggestions for ED improvement based upon your own personal experiences as a dementia caregiver.  This grant may be a genuine opportunity for caregivers to make a difference … to really affect the training of current and future ED doctors and improve the procedures followed in EDs across the country.  Let’s make the most of it!